In Rotherham over 1400 girls as young as 11 fell victim to paedophile gangs from the Pakistani community in that town between 1997 and 2010. It was know amongst the Labour-run authorities that this was going on and nothing was done, according to a report by Alexis Jay.
A researcher seconded from the home office produced a report on the case in 2002. She interviewed about 270 girls and their families and produced horrific reports such as girls being covered in petrol and threatened with being set alight if they resisted rape. It turned out that some the girls, some of them in care, were groomed and assaulted under the nose of the authorities charged with caring for them. It was also reported that in town where 8% of the population were of that ethnicity, that nearly all the perpetrators of the scandal were Pakistani. This is a striking pattern that you would think would be impossible to ignore but the authorities did. They pressured the researcher to change her report and leave out that pattern but she refused and she was threatened with the sack and sent to diversity training.
Why did social workers send the researcher to diversity training rather than publish her findings? Well, first of all, they did not want the ethnicity of the vast majority of the perpetrators to be released. The reason for this is that the social workers, and their bosses, had undergone brainwashing, sorry, ‘diversity training’. How did this lead to the ridiculous reaction to the scandal?
Fear of Being Called Racist.
This fear paralyses to many people within authority and therefore increases the chances of stupidity within the authorities. The word ‘racist’ is used to control white people since the diversity fanatics consider insolent white people to be a threat to the harmonic and vibrant society that the proponents of multiculturalist argue for it. Diversity training is used to instil this fantasy within the cogs of the state machine.
This case would imply that Diversity Training can instil a condition in the mentality that can stifle logical thinking and create an astounding ability to ignore what is in front of you. In order to make it a more effective method of control the common usage of the word ‘racism’ is very broad in definition. But beyond all this the word does have a narrower definition in reality – a belief in the inherent superiority of one race over another. So are we to believe that if anyone notices the striking pattern of the perpetrators then they are secretly a white supremacist? In the name of racial equality we should allow Muslim gangs to emulate their prophet and take young non-Muslim girls as sex slaves? Only sick mind would consider this – therefore Diversity Training instils a sickness in the mind as well as shrinking it.
Maintain the Delusion that Multiculturalism can Create a Harmonious Country
The social workers clearly came to the conclusion that anyone who does not know to ignore wrongdoing by anyone who happens to be of a ethnic minority needs to Diversity Training in order to loosen their grasp on reality. After all, if you are immersed in reality it is more difficult to shut it out.
One way that you can lose yourself into fantasy is to delve entirely into theory. More specifically Marxist-derived theory. You would not be explicitly told that multiculturalism and Diversity is ultimately derived from Marxism, specifically Gramscian and Frankfurt School varieties, because since the Soviet Union and the crimes committed by the state within it it is more difficult to do so effectively. If it is instead draped in a benevolent cover, for example, to promote peace and harmony and defending ‘vulnerable groups’, then soft-headed people can be brought round and those whom disagree with the madness would implicitly have their characters slandered. This is another reason for diversity training; they wanted the researcher to ‘learn’ that she would harm a ‘vulnerable group’ if she proceeded with the truth. Clearly then the social workers considered the 11 year old white girls being drugged and abused to be less vulnerable than their abusers.
Priorities are determined by ideology. Children’s services intervened in Rotherham when it found out that adoptive parents supported UKIP, and so took their children away because they would not teach the children to support multiculturalism. So supporting UKIP is considered to be a greater crime than raping under-age girls.
They were afraid that the local white population may stop passively accepting the ideological relegation of their interests since it was considered necessary to stop people voting BNP. Diversity training clearly teaches that it is good to allow sexual slavery in order to keep votes out of the hands of a party that may mobilise the local population to react against their subjugation in the name of an ideology designed to create an indigenous minority and replace the indigenous cultural identity with a more fashionable one. Without Diversity training there is the risk that the authorities may act in the interests of local people.
Adherence to Diversity can Boost the Career Prospects of a Local Authority Worker
It was claimed that there was pressure coming from the management so clearly it is in the interests of individuals further up the hierarchy. Management in local authorities are likely to be fully signed up members of the Diversity agenda because it is through adherence to Diversity that one climbs the career ladder. Sending someone to Diversity Training can look good for a manager.
Enforcing the Diversity ideology can look good for social workers at the bottom in their ambitions to achieve higher office and salaries. This is also the case for the police too. Knowing when to ignore the law can be learnt in Diversity Training. According to Jay’s report one girl, well under 16, was abused and the police officer in question claimed that it was consensual – despite legally a person under 16 cannot legally give consent so the girl was the victim of statutory rape by the much older abuser. Diversity teaches you what to ignore of you want to improve your career prospects (and salary).
This is all designed to create an institutionalised means in which the Diversity agenda is furthered and enforced. The researchers data for the report was stolen from her office in the council’s outreach centre for vulnerable youngsters. The council denies it but it is suspicious that the council had access, there was no break-in and only the data was stolen. Many local authorities, particularly those run by Labour, seem to model themselves on East Germany. Tactics are often used by ideologically -driven authorities. People can be driven by fear in such a climate hence why people may be so keen to be seen to be enforcing Diversity.
Conclusion
We live in a country that claims to be democratic but the structure of the state is saturated by an ideology that is put before the interests of ordinary people. In order to prosper it is considered necessary to be seen to enforce the ideology; people who cannot resist this may want others to succumb to so that their own weakness and lack of independent mindedness can be hidden behind an apparent belief in a principle.
This is why Diversity training has been used against thoughts can contradict the intentions of the Diversity agenda. It is assumed by those who are immersed within the alternative reality that Diversity inhabits that anyone who diverges from it has a defect that needs correcting. Because this ideology is all-encompassing a scandal as happened in Rotherham (and no doubt elsewhere) is considered an inconvenient detail that needs to be hidden.
resistancetoantidemocraticleft 